Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Norbert Gombos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Haider-Maurer vs Gombos analysis and find out who is favored!
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Norbert Gombos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Haider-Maurer 2 - 0 Gombos
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Haider-Maurer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gombos has won 48.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Haider-Maurer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gombos has won 48.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Haider-Maurer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gombos has saved 58.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Haider-Maurer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gombos winning 33.33% (W/L 11/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Haider-Maurer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 325/ 199), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13). Gombos has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 259/ 183), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Haider-Maurer winning 2 times and Gombos being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Haider-Maurer winning 4 and Gombos winning 1. The last match between Haider-Maurer and Gombos was at the Davis Cup, Group I, 2R, SVK-AUT 4-1, 06-04-2014, Rubber 4, I.hard with Andreas Haider-Maurer getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Haider-Maurer and Gombos have played a deciding set 1 times, with Haider-Maurer winning 1 times and Gombos 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Haider-Maurer winning 1, and Gombos 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Haider-Maurer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gombos has played against players with an average rank of 328.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Haider-Maurer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gombos has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Haider-Maurer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gombos has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
47
High
37
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
525
Rank
80
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
57% (447-336)
Career Total W/L
56% (520-402)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
38% (5-8)
$723,565
Career Prize Money
$1,135,685
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Haider-Maurer VS Gombos H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Norbert Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:17 | 1:9:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (47/82) | 53% (45/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (34/47) | 67% (30/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (16/35) | 40% (16/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (39/85) | 39% (32/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Haider-Maurer VS Gombos H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-5 | |||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Norbert Gombos
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Norbert Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 39% (13/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (141/167) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 388.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 54% (501/933) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (352/501) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (208/432) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (33/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (361/976) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Andreas Haider-Maurer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Mikhail Balmashev
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alen Avidzba
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
34 of
39)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
10
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
4
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
54 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Norbert Gombos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Norbert Gombos
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Andrea Picchione
51%
(
64 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
105)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
50%
(
31 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Mateus Alves
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Henri Laaksonen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Orlando Luz
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Haider-Maurer Vs Gombos Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
